Prediction of Tennys Sandgren vs Nikala Scholtz Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Sandgren vs N. Scholtz

Tennys Sandgren
USA
w
l
w
w
w
l
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
34
Age
34
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
-
740
C. Rank
Ret.
41
Best Rank
320
1
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$2.3M
Career Money
$4.3K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Nikala Scholtz
RSA
w
l
l
l
l
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
34
Age
34
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
-
740
C. Rank
Ret.
41
Best Rank
320
1
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$2.3M
Career Money
$4.3K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Sandgren 1 - 0 Scholtz
They have played 3 sets in total, with Tennys Sandgren winning 2 and Nikala Scholtz winning 1. The last match between Tennys Sandgren and Nikala Scholtz was at the USA F5, 20-02-2012, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Tennys Sandgren getting the victory 2-6 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sandgren | 1 |
| Scholtz | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) USA F5(02-20-12)
Tennys Sandgren
2
6
6
Nikala Scholtz
6
1
4
T. Sandgren vs N. Scholtz H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $2,256,263 | Career Prize Money | $4,340 |
| 56.43% (421-325) | Career Total W/L | 64.58% (217-119) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 16 | Titles | 13 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Sandgren vs N. Scholtz Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tennys Sandgren has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Nikala Scholtz has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tennys Sandgren, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nikala Scholtz has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tennys Sandgren has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nikala Scholtz has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tennys Sandgren has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Nikala Scholtz winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tennys Sandgren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 241/175), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 11/10). Nikala Scholtz has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 213/104), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 17% (W/L 1/5).
- Player level: In the last year, Tennys Sandgren has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Nikala Scholtz has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tennys Sandgren winning 1 times and Nikala Scholtz being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Tennys Sandgren winning 2 and Nikala Scholtz winning 1.
- The last match between Tennys Sandgren and Nikala Scholtz was at the USA F5, 20-02-2012, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Tennys Sandgren getting the victory 2-6 6-1 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tennys Sandgren has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Nikala Scholtz has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tennys Sandgren has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nikala Scholtz has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tennys Sandgren has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nikala Scholtz has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Tennys Sandgren vs Nikala Scholtz Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Sandgren vs N. Scholtz H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 14 | Games Won | 11 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Sandgren 0%, Scholtz 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Sandgren 0%, Scholtz 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Sandgren 0%, Scholtz 0%.
T. Sandgren Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 1-6 6-0 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
R2 | L | 6-2 6-7(5) 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 6-3 | ||
SF | L | 6-2 3-6 6-4 | ||
N. Scholtz Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 7-5 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 6-1 6-7(0) 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 7-6(7) | ||

T. Sandgren vs N. Scholtz Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.43% (421/325) | YTD Win/Loss | 64.58% (217/119) |
| 55.82% (993/786) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.28% (466/307) |
| 52.11% (8948/8222) | Games Win/Loss | 53.70% (4049/3491) |
| 57.93% (241/175) | Hard Win/Loss | 67.19% (213/104) |
| 52.84% (93/83) | Clay Win/Loss | 16.67% (1/5) |
| 57.14% (76/57) | Indoor Hard W/L | 23.08% (3/10) |
| 52.38% (11/10) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.48 | Aces Per Game | 0.43 |
| 4008 | Aces Total | 1598 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1355 | Total Double Faults | 512 |
| 1:18:11 | Average Match Time | 1:1:36 |
| 532.61 | Average Opponent Rank | 613.72 |
| 61% (25668/42295) | 1st Serve % | 65% (8867/13657) |
| 73% (18700/25668) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (6628/8867) |
| 50% (8246/16625) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (2445/4791) |
| 38% (1428/3756) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (501/1279) |
| 37% (15591/42108) | Return Points Win % | 37% (5397/14428) |
| 43.86% (25/32) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 36.36% (12/21) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 38.46% (5/8) |
| 40.86% (38/55) | Main Tour W/L | 44.44% (4/5) |
| 55.87% (195/154) | Challenger W/L | 20.00% (5/20) |
| 70.89% (151/62) | Futures W/L | 70.24% (203/86) |
| 57% (402/706) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (209/324) |
| 46% (17/37) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (4/6) |
| 52% (161/309) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (77/139) |
| 47% (110/236) | Deciding Set Win % | 64% (64/100) |
| 83% (434/360) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (191/176) |
| 17% (434/74) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (191/15) |
| 20% (312/62) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (144/38) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction07:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction12:30 PM 17/11/25
Prediction05:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction11:10 PM 16/11/25
Prediction07:00 AM 17/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
H2H 0-0
22:50
H2H 0-0
02:00
H2H 0-0
02:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Champaign Challenger
United States
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal